Viva Corrections Help in Malaysia — Every Examiner Comment Answered, Located and Ready for Sign-Off

Yes. Send the examiners' report and the thesis as examined. We number every comment, make the changes in your file with tracked edits, and complete the correction report or table your faculty uses. If any comment needs reanalysis of your data, we tell you at triage so the timeline and price reflect it from the start.

Wording differs by university, so read your own report first. In UTM's guidelines for examiners, minor corrections are typographic or factual errors validated by the supervisor, while larger amendments to methodology, analysis, discussion or structure are validated by the examiners. In practice, major usually means some chapters are rewritten or results rerun, not just polished.

The period is set at your viva and stated in the report, so check that first. As one example, UTM's guidelines for examiners give one month for minor corrections, and three months for a Master's or six for a PhD where examiners validate amendments. UTM also states the degree is not awarded if corrections miss the set period.

Do not quietly pick one. We draft the change that meets the firmer requirement and a short, respectful justification for how the other comment was handled, so both appear answered in the table. Your supervisor should see that reasoning before it goes to the examiners, and can raise it with the committee if needed.

Yes, and this is one of the most common requests in a correction round. Each flagged claim is matched to a real, recent peer-reviewed source you can open, or the claim is softened where the evidence is not there. New references are added in the thesis's existing style, whether APA 7th, Vancouver or Gaya UKM.

Ya. BM theses are corrected by BM-fluent writers, using the istilah already established in your chapters. When examiners comment in English on a BM thesis, the changes are made in BM and the correction table is written in the language your faculty expects, so nothing is lost between the two.

Yes. Universiti Malaya's form groups comments by External Examiner 1, External Examiner 2, Internal Examiner and the Committee, with section, page and comment for each, then your correction and space for supervisor and internal examiner confirmation. We complete it row by row from the report. Other universities' forms are handled the same way.

No. We work only with you. You review the corrections and the table, take them to your supervisor or the verifying examiner, and make the submission to SPS or IPS yourself. If a verifier queries a line, send us the query and we revise that line.

Yes. Send the report, your partly corrected thesis and whatever table you have started. We check what is done against each comment, finish the remainder, and rebuild the table so every row has a location. If something you changed does not quite answer the comment, we point it out rather than leave it.

Yes. We build a mock panel from the first examiners' report: the questions they are likely to return to, and short answers that point to what changed in the revised thesis. Preparation is RM 790. If the revised thesis itself needs work first, that is scoped as a resubmission.

No. SV comment fixing is for feedback from your supervisor before the thesis is submitted for examination. Viva corrections happen after examination, are judged by the examiners or a verifier, and need a formal correction table. If your comments are still from your penyelia before submission, use the supervisor comment service instead.

Corrections can raise similarity when new text borrows heavily from sources. We write added material in our own words with proper citations, and we can check a Turnitin report you share. We do not promise a particular percentage, and AI detectors can misfire on human writing, so we will not claim any score is guaranteed.