A systematic review is a method, not a long literature review — if your search string is not reproducible, it is not systematic. Fourteen years of PRISMA-based review work built on that distinction.
No marketing biography. Here is the qualification, the experience and the working method — so you can judge whether they are right for your thesis.
Dr. Kamal holds a PhD in Public Health from Universiti Putra Malaysia, with fourteen years of experience specifically in systematic review methodology — PRISMA 2020 protocols, reproducible search strategies and meta-analysis reporting.
He has supported candidates across public health, nursing and evidence-based practice programmes at UPM and several other institutions, building search strings for Scopus, Web of Science and PubMed that a reviewer can actually replicate.
Quality appraisal is treated as a required stage rather than optional — a systematic review that includes a weak study and a rigorous one as equal evidence is not synthesis, and panels familiar with the method notice immediately.
He starts with your research question stated in PICO or an equivalent structured format, since the review question determines every downstream decision about search strategy and inclusion criteria.
The search string is built database by database, documented precisely enough that another researcher could reproduce your search exactly — the single requirement most self-guided systematic reviews fail.
Include your supervisor's comments and your faculty guideline document. You'll get a scope and a price back, not a sales call.
Get a Free Quote →These are the areas they take on themselves. Anything outside them gets routed to the specialist who covers it — you are told who, and why.
PRISMA 2020 protocols and flow diagrams built from a reproducible search strategy across Scopus, Web of Science and PubMed.
Systematic review manuscripts prepared for publication, structured to meet journal-specific reporting standards.
A named appraisal tool applied consistently across every included study, with scores reported as a required stage.
Forest plots and pooled effect estimates reported to the standard a health research panel expects.
Not sure whether your chapter falls inside Kamal's scope?Send it anyway. If it is not their field, we will tell you which specialist it belongs to before you pay anything.
Ask Kamal →"My original search string was not documented properly and my examiner asked me to reproduce it — I could not. He rebuilt it database by database so every step was traceable. Passed without further questions."
"I had included a weak study and a strong one as if they carried equal weight. He introduced a proper quality appraisal tool and my synthesis chapter became far more defensible."
"PRISMA flow diagram numbers did not add up before he reviewed it. Found the discrepancy in my full-text exclusion count within minutes."
Want to read more student feedback?Reviews across every specialist on our panel, including the ones that were not five stars.
Read All Reviews →