A high similarity score is usually a citation problem, not a plagiarism problem — read the report before you panic. Ten years of Turnitin and AI-compliance work built around that first, calming step.
No marketing biography. Here is the qualification, the experience and the working method — so you can judge whether they are right for your thesis.
Dr. Anand holds a PhD in Information Science from Universiti Sains Malaysia, with research interests in text analysis that translate directly into his current work: reading a similarity or AI-detection report properly before deciding what, if anything, actually needs fixing.
Most similarity reports he reviews are dominated by reference lists and standard methodological phrasing rather than genuine plagiarism — distinguishing between the two, and only rewriting what genuinely needs it, is the core of his service.
As AI-detection tools have become part of Malaysian university submission processes, he has extended this same careful-reading approach to AI-flagged text, since detectors are known to misfire on formal academic writing and non-native English patterns.
He reads the full report first — which sections are flagged, whether matches are genuine overlap or just citation formatting, and whether AI-detection flags cluster around specific paragraphs rather than the whole document.
Only passages that genuinely need it are rewritten, preserving your own argument and meaning throughout. Citation and paraphrasing practice is corrected properly rather than just reworded superficially, so the same issue does not reappear in your next chapter.
Include your supervisor's comments and your faculty guideline document. You'll get a scope and a price back, not a sales call.
Get a Free Quote →These are the areas they take on themselves. Anything outside them gets routed to the specialist who covers it — you are told who, and why.
AI-flagged passages rewritten into human academic prose, addressing the specific patterns that trigger detectors without losing meaning.
Similarity report interpretation for supervisors, distinguishing genuine overlap from standard citation and methodological phrasing.
Paraphrasing and citation corrected properly at the source, so similarity issues do not reappear in later chapters.
Reference list formatting checked as part of the same review, since inconsistent citation is a common contributor to inflated similarity scores.
Not sure whether your chapter falls inside Anand's scope?Send it anyway. If it is not their field, we will tell you which specialist it belongs to before you pay anything.
Ask Anand →"My Turnitin score was 32% and I thought I would fail. He showed me it was almost entirely my reference list and standard methodology phrasing. Fixed the small genuine overlap and I was at 9%."
"My chapter was flagged by an AI detector even though I wrote every word myself. He rewrote the flagged sections in a way that read naturally and passed on resubmission."
"Thorough review of my whole thesis for similarity issues. He explained clearly what was genuine and what was just my citation style. Took a bit of back and forth on my methodology chapter but the outcome was solid."
Want to read more student feedback?Reviews across every specialist on our panel, including the ones that were not five stars.
Read All Reviews →