Twelve years working in health research, where the ethics section is never paperwork — get it wrong and data collection stops before it starts. Dr. Siti Aisyah's students spend less time waiting on JEP resubmissions than most.
No marketing biography. Here is the qualification, the experience and the working method — so you can judge whether they are right for your thesis.
Dr. Siti Aisyah holds a PhD in Nursing from Universiti Kebangsaan Malaysia, with clinical research experience across public hospital settings before moving into full-time academic support. Ethics documentation for clinical and patient-facing studies is where she spends the most time with students, since a rejected JEP or MREC submission can cost months.
She has worked with nursing, public health and allied health candidates at UKM, UPM and several teaching hospitals' affiliated programmes, including systematic review protocols using PRISMA for evidence-based practice research.
Her approach treats the ethics application as part of the methodology, not a separate hurdle — the same justification that satisfies a review board should also satisfy an academic panel.
She starts with your study design and your institution's specific ethics requirements, since JEP, MREC and university ethics committees each have their own expectations that a generic template will not satisfy.
Once ethics documentation is settled, the methodology chapter is built around the actual access and consent process your study will use — not an idealised version that would not survive real data collection in a Malaysian clinical or public health setting.
Include your supervisor's comments and your faculty guideline document. You'll get a scope and a price back, not a sales call.
Get a Free Quote →These are the areas they take on themselves. Anything outside them gets routed to the specialist who covers it — you are told who, and why.
Clinical and nursing research design, including ethics documentation for JEP and MREC submissions built to survive first review.
PRISMA-based systematic review protocols for evidence-based practice research, with a reproducible search strategy from the start.
Ethics applications written as part of the methodology itself, addressing access, consent and data protection the way a review board actually checks them.
Clinical and public health findings presented with the sensitivity and precision a health research panel expects.
Not sure whether your chapter falls inside Siti Aisyah's scope?Send it anyway. If it is not their field, we will tell you which specialist it belongs to before you pay anything.
Ask Siti Aisyah →"My JEP application was rejected once already before I found her. She rewrote it addressing every point the committee raised and it was approved on the second submission."
"The PRISMA protocol she built for my systematic review meant my search strategy was completely reproducible. My examiner specifically noted this in my viva."
"Ethics documentation for my clinical study was thorough and got approved without issue. The methodology chapter itself needed one round of revision on the sampling section but the final result was strong."
Want to read more student feedback?Reviews across every specialist on our panel, including the ones that were not five stars.
Read All Reviews →