Thirteen years turning SPSS and SmartPLS output into findings chapters an examiner can follow. Ahmad Faizal's argument is simple: a business thesis is not the data, it is the case you build with the data.
No marketing biography. Here is the qualification, the experience and the working method — so you can judge whether they are right for your thesis.
Ahmad Faizal holds a PhD in Business Administration from Universiti Malaya, where his research used structural equation modelling to test a conceptual model across the Malaysian SME sector. That is the exact skill most MBA and DBA candidates need help with — not running the test, but explaining why that test and what the coefficients mean for the hypotheses.
He has supervised and reviewed business research across UM, UUM, UNITEN and several private business schools, spanning marketing, finance, HR and strategy specialisations. Framework development is where he spends the most time with students, since a weak conceptual model creates problems that no amount of careful analysis writing can fix later.
Panels in business faculties look for practical implications, not just statistical significance. He builds that expectation into the discussion chapter from the start rather than bolting it on afterward.
He starts by reading your framework and your SPSS or SmartPLS output together, checking that every path in the model is actually tested and reported. Gaps here are the single most common reason a findings chapter gets sent back.
The write-up moves hypothesis by hypothesis: what was tested, what the result was, and what it means — in that order, with tables formatted to your faculty's requirement. A short note flags any result that needs a careful, defensible explanation in the discussion.
Include your supervisor's comments and your faculty guideline document. You'll get a scope and a price back, not a sales call.
Get a Free Quote →These are the areas they take on themselves. Anything outside them gets routed to the specialist who covers it — you are told who, and why.
Research framework, hypothesis development and justified sampling for business research — built to hold up against a business faculty's specific expectations.
Full chapter support across MBA and DBA research, from proposal through to viva preparation.
SPSS and SmartPLS output turned into a findings chapter that argues, hypothesis by hypothesis, rather than just reporting numbers.
Framework and hypotheses built to survive a proposal defence, with every construct traceable to a cited source.
Not sure whether your chapter falls inside Faizal's scope?Send it anyway. If it is not their field, we will tell you which specialist it belongs to before you pay anything.
Ask Faizal →"I had run the SmartPLS analysis myself but could not explain what half the path coefficients meant for my hypotheses. He walked me through it hypothesis by hypothesis. I could defend every number in my viva."
"My conceptual model was too broad and I did not realise it until he pointed out that two of my constructs overlapped. Fixing that early saved my whole analysis chapter later."
"Solid work on my discussion chapter, practical implications section was exactly what my panel wanted. One round of revision needed on formatting but the content was strong from the start."
Want to read more student feedback?Reviews across every specialist on our panel, including the ones that were not five stars.
Read All Reviews →