Sixteen years spent on one problem: why good research keeps getting sent back. Dr. Hasan works on the methodology chapter and the supervisor comments that follow it — the two places where most Malaysian postgraduates lose the most time.
No marketing biography. Here is the qualification, the experience and the working method — so you can judge whether they are right for your thesis.
Dr. Hasan completed his doctorate in research methodology at Universiti Malaya after a Masters in social research methods at UKM. Both degrees were about the same thing: how research decisions get justified, and what happens when they are not.
Over sixteen years he has worked with postgraduates across education, management, public health and the social sciences — at UM, UKM, UiTM, UPM, UUM and several private institutions. That range matters, because a methodology chapter is judged against faculty conventions, and those conventions differ more than most students expect.
He is direct about scope. If your topic sits outside his field, he will say so and point you to the specialist who covers it rather than take the work anyway. Several students have been told their research design would not survive data collection — before they collected anything.
Every engagement starts with reading what you already have: your draft, your faculty guideline document and, most importantly, your supervisor's actual comments. Not a summary of them — the marked-up file.
You then get a written scope before any writing begins: what will change, what will not, how long it takes and what it costs. Nothing starts until you agree to that. Work is delivered with a similarity report, and one revision round after supervisor feedback is included as standard.
Include your supervisor's comments and your faculty guideline document. You'll get a scope and a price back, not a sales call.
Get a Free Quote →These are the areas they take on themselves. Anything outside them gets routed to the specialist who covers it — you are told who, and why.
Research philosophy, design, sampling strategy, instrumentation and analysis technique — each one justified rather than just named. Quantitative, qualitative and mixed methods.
Send the marked-up PDF. Dr. Hasan reads what your supervisor actually wrote, turns it into a numbered revision plan, and produces a response-to-comments table you can submit alongside the draft.
Chapters 1 to 3 built as one argument: problem, gap, objectives, questions and method all lining up. The alignment your panel checks first.
Scoping a topic that is genuinely researchable inside your semester, with data you can actually get hold of — before you commit a year to it.
Doctoral-level methodology and chapter development, including the theoretical contribution examiners look for and the defence questions that follow from it.
End-to-end support across every chapter, with one consistent argument running from your problem statement to your conclusion.
Not sure whether your chapter falls inside Hasan's scope?Send it anyway. If it is not their field, we will tell you which specialist it belongs to before you pay anything.
Ask Hasan →"My methodology chapter came back three times. Dr. Hasan asked me one question — why interpretivism and not pragmatism — and I could not answer it. That was the whole problem. The rebuilt chapter went through with no major revisions."
"I sent him fourteen pages of supervisor comments I did not understand. He came back with a numbered list of what each one actually meant and what to change. That list alone saved me a month."
"He prepared me for my proposal defence by asking the questions the panel would ask. Two of them came up almost word for word. I was not caught off guard once."
"What I appreciated most is that he told me my original sampling plan would not work before I collected anything. Painful to hear at the time. Saved my entire data collection."
Want to read more student feedback?Reviews across every specialist on our panel, including the ones that were not five stars.
Read All Reviews →