Topic & Title Screening ยท Malaysia ยท 2026

Thesis Topic Selection Help for Malaysian Postgrads

A topic your supervisor approves is not the one you find most interesting. It is the one that is narrow enough to defend, has a gap you can point at in named studies, and can actually be finished in the months you have left. We screen topics against those tests before you commit a semester to the wrong one.

๐ŸŽฏ Shortlist, Not One Guess ๐Ÿ” Gap Evidence for Each โฑ๏ธ Screened for Your Timeframe ๐Ÿ’ฐ From RM 120
๐Ÿ“‹ Get Your Topic Screened

Shortlist and price โ€” tell us your constraints first

๐Ÿ“
1,400+
Proposals Written
๐Ÿ’ฌ
6 in 10
Come With SV Comments
โฑ๏ธ
6 Days
Average Turnaround
๐Ÿ”
Free
Revision After Feedback
Proposal formats we work with
UiTM university logo UKM university logo UPM university logo UTM university logo USM university logo UTHM university logo UTAR university logo MMU university logo Monash university logo Sunway university logo Taylor's university logo APU university logo INTI university logo UNITAR university logo OUM university logo WOU university logo

Independent service โ€” no university affiliation. ThesisHelper Malaysia is a private academic support provider. We are not affiliated with, endorsed by, accredited by or officially connected to any university, college or examination body shown above. All institution names and marks remain the property of their respective owners and appear here only to describe the proposal formats and submission requirements our writers work with.

Why Topics Get Rejected

Why Does My Supervisor Keep Rejecting My Research Topic?

Almost never because the idea is uninteresting.

๐ŸŒ

The Topic Covers Half a Field

"Artificial intelligence in education." "Factors affecting academic performance." One supervisor put it to a student bluntly: topics at that width get rejected on sight, because there is no way to say what the study will actually measure or on whom.

๐Ÿ•ณ๏ธ

There Is No Gap Behind It

You can describe the topic but not what is missing from what has already been published. "Limited studies exist in Malaysia" is a guess, not a gap, and it is the sentence that gets circled most often on a first submission.

โณ

It Cannot Be Finished in Time

Three states, two industries and a longitudinal design โ€” in a coursework project with three months of writing time. Scope that ignores the calendar is rejected even when the idea is genuinely good.

๐Ÿšช

You Cannot Reach the Data

Hospital staff, government officers, listed-company executives, schoolchildren. Some populations need approvals you will not get in time, and a topic is worthless if the respondents are unreachable from where you sit.

๐ŸŽ“

It Doesn't Fit Your Programme

A data science candidate proposing a policy study. An education student proposing pure engineering. Faculties check that the research clearly belongs to the degree you are registered for, and this catches more students than you would expect.

๐Ÿ”

It's Already Been Done

The exact study exists โ€” same variables, same population, published two years ago in a journal you had not searched. Discovering that in your literature review is expensive. Discovering it before you register the title costs nothing.

Topic sent back more than once? Send us the title and the supervisor's wording โ€” we'll tell you which of these six it is.

Diagnose My Topic โ†’
What You Receive

What Our Thesis Topic Selection Help Actually Delivers

Built so you can walk into a supervision meeting and defend the choice.

๐Ÿ“‹

A Shortlist, Not a Single Guess

Three to five candidate topics inside your field and your constraints, so you choose between real options instead of accepting the first idea that survives. Supervisors respond far better to a student presenting alternatives.

3โ€“5 OptionsFrom RM 180
๐Ÿ”

Gap Evidence for Every Option

Each topic comes with the specific recent studies that surround it and a plain statement of what they did not examine. Named papers, named limitations โ€” not an assertion that research is scarce.

Named StudiesLast 5 Years
โš–๏ธ

Feasibility Screening

Population reachable, data collectable, ethics approval realistic, analysis within your skill set, and the whole thing finishable in the semesters you have left. A topic that fails any of these is discarded before it reaches your shortlist.

Five ChecksPer Topic
๐Ÿท๏ธ

Title Formulation

The final wording matters more than students expect. A working title should name the variables, the population and the context in one readable line โ€” the form examiners and registration systems both expect.

Registration-ReadyVariables Named
๐Ÿงฑ

Aim, Objectives & Question Skeleton

One aim, a realistic set of objectives and the research questions that mirror them โ€” enough structure to prove the topic can carry a study, without writing the proposal yet. Where your supervisor has specified a shape, we follow it exactly.

One Page1:1 Mapping
๐Ÿ“š

Preliminary Reading List

Ten to fifteen recent, retrievable sources per chosen topic, with the PDFs where we can supply them. You start Chapter 2 already holding the papers instead of spending three weeks searching for a foothold.

10โ€“15 SourcesPDFs Where Possible
๐Ÿ—ฃ๏ธ

Supervisor Pitch One-Pager

A single page that states the problem, the gap, the proposed design and why it is achievable. Several faculties ask for exactly this to match you with a supervisor before formal registration.

Supervisor-FacingFrom RM 150
๐Ÿ‡ฒ๐Ÿ‡พ

Pemilihan Tajuk dalam Bahasa Malaysia

Untuk program yang memerlukan tajuk dalam BM โ€” titles formulated in Bahasa Malaysia with correct academic terminology, plus an English rendering where your faculty wants both on the registration form.

BM TitlesBilingual

Only need one topic checked, not a shortlist?Send the title you already have. A single feasibility check starts at RM 120 and takes a day or two.

Check One Topic โ†’
How We Screen

How We Find a Research Topic That Survives Approval

Five stages, usually inside a week.

1
Your Constraints First
Programme, months remaining, who you can reach, what analysis you can handle.
2
Scan the Recent Literature
We read the last few years, especially the future-research sections.
3
Screen Against Five Checks
Anything that fails on scope, gap, data access, ethics or timeline is dropped here.
4
Shortlist With Justification
You receive the survivors with their gap evidence and trade-offs written out.
5
Refine the One You Pick
Final title wording, aim and objectives skeleton, and your reading list.

Stage one is a conversation, not an invoice.Tell us your programme and how long you have left. We'll say whether topic screening is even what you need.

Start With My Constraints โ†’
The Screening Standard

The Four Tests Every Research Topic Has to Pass

Every topic we shortlist is screened against all four.

๐ŸŽฏ

Test 1 โ€” It Must Be Very Specific

Name the variables, the population and the setting. "Digital adoption among SMEs" fails; "cloud accounting adoption among Selangor manufacturing SMEs" passes, because you can now say exactly who you will ask and what you will measure.

๐Ÿ•ณ๏ธ

Test 2 โ€” The Gap Must Be Clear

Not "little research exists" but a limitation you can attribute to particular studies: they measured a different construct, sampled a different country, or tested the relationship without the moderator you intend to add.

โฑ๏ธ

Test 3 โ€” It Must Be Doable in the Time You Have

For a coursework project that can mean three months, start to finish. The design has to fit that window including approvals, distribution, chasing responses and writing โ€” not just the analysis you are picturing.

๐Ÿ’ก

Test 4 โ€” It Must Add One Clear Value

One. Not four contributions listed hopefully in a paragraph. If you cannot finish the sentence "because of this study, someone will now be able toโ€ฆ", the topic is not ready to register.

Matched to Your Programme

Topic Expectations Change From FYP to PhD

We calibrate the shortlist to what your level is actually judged on.

๐ŸŽ“

FYP Topics That Fit One Semester

Judged mainly on whether it can be completed in one or two semesters with data you can genuinely reach โ€” often classmates, one organisation, or a public dataset. Originality matters far less than finishing.

Bachelor / FYPFeasibility First
๐Ÿ“—

Master's & MBA Topics

Needs a defensible gap and a framework with named variables.

Masters / MBAGap Required
๐Ÿ”ฌ

PhD & DBA Topics

An original contribution has to be arguable at the topic stage, not discovered later.

PhD / DBAContribution Arguable

When Your Supervisor Insists on Primary Data

Some supervisors will not accept a study built on public or third-party datasets. If that is your rule, every topic on your shortlist is screened for whether you can realistically collect your own responses โ€” who they are, how many, and where you will find them.

Studying in Malaysia, Researching Elsewhere

Enrolled here but planning to collect data in your home country? Topics are screened for remote data access, ethics implications across two jurisdictions, and whether your Malaysian examiners will find the setting justified.

Where Gaps Actually Come From

Eight Places a Defensible Research Gap Comes From

Students look for gaps by searching for what does not exist, which never works. Gaps are found inside what already exists โ€” here is where we look.

๐Ÿ“ฃ
Future Research Sections
The most underused paragraph in academia. Authors state plainly what their study could not do โ€” and a gap you can cite to a named paper is far stronger than one you inferred.
โš”๏ธ
Contradictory Findings
Two credible studies reach opposite conclusions on the same relationship. Explaining why โ€” a moderator, a different context, a different measure โ€” is a legitimate contribution in itself.
๐ŸŒ
Context Transfer
A relationship established in Western or Chinese settings but never tested in a Malaysian one. Defensible only when you can argue why the context should change the result.
๐Ÿ‘ฅ
Under-Studied Populations
The construct is well researched among corporate employees but not among gig workers, rural teachers, B40 households or SME owners. Population gaps are the easiest to evidence.
๐Ÿ”ง
Methodological Gaps
Everything published used cross-sectional surveys, or everything was qualitative. Approaching an established question with a different design is a contribution examiners recognise.
๐Ÿงฉ
Missing Variables
Two constructs are consistently linked, but nobody has tested what sits between them. Introducing a justified mediator or moderator is the most common route for Malaysian business research.
๐Ÿ“œ
Policy & Industry Documents
National blueprints, regulator reports and industry surveys name problems that academic literature has not caught up with yet. Practical relevance is easy to argue from these.
๐Ÿ†•
Genuinely New Phenomena
Technologies, regulations or working practices that are only two or three years old. Thin literature is a real gap here โ€” but only if you can still find enough to build a review on.

Have an area but no gap yet?Tell us the field and we'll come back with where the openings actually sit in the recent literature.

Find My Gap โ†’
1,100+
Topics Screened
5
Checks Before It Reaches You
3โ€“5
Options in Every Shortlist
Who Screens Your Topic

Researchers Who Have Approved and Rejected Topics Themselves

Judging whether a topic will survive requires having sat on the other side of that decision. All three below have.

Available Now
Dr. Farhana Ismail Zaidi
Business, Management & Organisational Topics
โ˜…โ˜…โ˜…โ˜…โ˜…4.9ยท 300+ topics screened

๐ŸŽ“Management doctorate from a Malaysian public university

๐Ÿ•Reviews title registrations for a postgraduate committee

Best At Finding
  • โœ“Mediator and moderator gaps in established models
  • โœ“Under-researched Malaysian industries and sectors
  • โœ“Topics that survive a three-month coursework window
  • โœ“Titles that name variables without becoming unreadable

"Students bring me an interest and expect a topic. An interest becomes a topic the moment you can name who you will ask and what you will measure."

Work with Farhana โ†’
Available Now
Dr. Chong Wai Keat
Technical, Computing & Data Topics
โ˜…โ˜…โ˜…โ˜…โ˜…4.8ยท 240+ topics screened

๐ŸŽ“Civil engineering doctorate, Malaysian public university

๐Ÿ•Has rejected topics as a panel member; knows why they fail

Best At Finding
  • โœ“Technical topics with reachable datasets and testbeds
  • โœ“Scope that fits the equipment you can actually book
  • โœ“Applied problems taken from industry reports
  • โœ“Computing questions that need primary survey data

"The topics I sent back weren't unambitious. They were unbuildable โ€” the student had no access to the thing they proposed to measure."

Work with Keat โ†’
Available Now
Dr. Thivya Rajendran
Education, Health & Social Topics
โ˜…โ˜…โ˜…โ˜…โ˜…4.9ยท 270+ topics screened

๐ŸŽ“Social policy doctorate, Malaysian public university

๐Ÿ•Supervises master's candidates through title registration

Best At Finding
  • โœ“Population gaps in education and health research
  • โœ“Topics where ethics approval is realistically obtainable
  • โœ“Qualitative questions with reachable participants
  • โœ“Titles in Bahasa Malaysia with correct terminology

"Half the topics I see fail on access, not on ideas. Ask who will let you into the room before you fall in love with the question."

Work with Thivya โ†’
Available Now
Muhammad Haziq bin Ismail
Literature Review & Topic Scoping
โ˜…โ˜…โ˜…โ˜…โ˜…4.8ยท 390+ topics screened

๐ŸŽ“MPhil Research Methods, Universiti Teknologi MARA (UiTM)

๐Ÿ•8 years supporting Malaysian students ยท Bahasa Malaysia ยท English

Best At Finding
  • โœ“Research gap identification from current literature
  • โœ“Literature matrices and synthesis tables
  • โœ“Topic scoping that fits your programme timeline
  • โœ“Penulisan tesis dalam Bahasa Malaysia

"If you cannot say what is missing in the field in one sentence, the gap isn't clear yet โ€” and your panel will find that out."

Work with Haziq โ†’

Want your field's specialist on it?Tell us the discipline and whether your supervisor has set any rules. We'll match you before you pay anything.

Match Me to a Specialist โ†’
The Difference

Why Malaysian Candidates Bring Us Their Topic First

A generated list of titles costs nothing and is worth about that much.

๐Ÿšซ

We Discard More Than We Send

Most candidate topics fail screening before you ever see them โ€” usually on data access or timeline. You receive the survivors, which is why a shortlist of four is more useful than a list of twenty.

๐Ÿ“Ž

Every Gap Points at Real Papers

You can open the studies we cite and read the limitation for yourself. That matters at the moment your supervisor asks how you arrived at the gap, which they will.

๐Ÿ—“๏ธ

Your Calendar Is a Screening Criterion

Not an afterthought. If you have one semester left, topics needing ethics approval and a three-month distribution window are cut at stage three rather than offered with a warning attached.

๐ŸŽ“

Written to Your Supervisor's Rules

Primary data only? One aim and four objectives? No hypotheses? Send whatever they have told you and the shortlist is built inside those constraints rather than around them.

๐Ÿ’ฌ

You Get the Reasoning, Not Just Titles

Each option arrives with why it works and what it will cost you in effort. You need to defend this choice out loud in a supervision meeting โ€” memorising a title is not enough.

๐Ÿ”—

The Same Specialist Can Continue

Whoever screens your topic already understands your constraints. If you go on to a proposal, they carry that context forward instead of you re-explaining everything to someone new.

Real Outcome

Case Study: Two Rejected Titles, Three Months Left, One Approval

StudentJ.R.
ProgrammeMSc Data Science
RejectionsTwo Prior Titles
ConstraintPrimary Data, 3 Months
โœ“ Approved on Third Attempt
๐Ÿ”ด The Problem

J.R. had two titles rejected in six weeks. His supervisor's written feedback was unusually direct: the topic had to be very specific, carry a clear research gap, be completable in three months, and add one clear value โ€” and he named broad areas like AI in education and academic performance as examples of what would not be accepted. He also insisted the study run on primary data the student collected himself, not a public dataset. J.R. understood every word and still had no idea how to turn it into a title.

๐Ÿ”ต What We Did

We started from his constraints rather than his interests. Three months meant one collection round with no protected population, which ruled out schools and hospitals. We read the last three years of analytics-adoption literature and pulled four candidate gaps. Two failed the timeline check and were dropped. The two survivors went to him with trade-offs written out, and he chose the one whose respondents he could reach in a fortnight.

๐ŸŸข The Result

The title was approved at the next meeting with no changes requested, and his supervisor specifically noted that the scope was finally realistic. J.R. began instrument design the following week and returned to us for his proposal a month later.

Been rejected more than once?Send both rejected titles and the exact feedback. The pattern in those comments usually tells us what will pass.

Rescue My Topic โ†’
Sample Work

Sample Topic Shortlists Built for Malaysian Candidates

Shortlist 01 ยท MBA, Private University
Four Topics on Digital Payment Adoption Among Malaysian Micro-Enterprises
Delivered: 4 options ยท gap evidence ยท feasibility notes
Student Needed

A fintech-related MBA topic, but she did not know whether she was expected to bring her own or wait to be assigned one.

What It Shows

Four narrowed options across adoption, trust, merchant resistance and post-adoption continuance โ€” each with the studies that surround it and the specific limitation it exploits.

Why It Works

Every option names a reachable respondent group. None depends on access she would have had to negotiate for months.

Shortlist 02 ยท Diploma FYP, Biotechnology
Three Waste-Management Project Topics Completable in One Semester
Delivered: 3 options ยท lab access screening
Student Needed

An environment or waste-management topic for a diploma final year project, with no clear idea what scale was realistic at that level.

What It Shows

Three options screened against equipment his campus actually had, sample material he could source locally, and a single semester of working time.

Why It Works

Ambition was matched to a diploma, not to a master's. The most interesting option was cut because the analysis needed equipment he could not book.

Shortlist 03 ยท PhD Pendidikan
Lima Tajuk Kepimpinan Guru untuk Sekolah Jenis Kebangsaan
Delivered: 5 BM titles ยท contribution statements
Student Needed

Doctoral titles in Bahasa Malaysia on teacher leadership, each with an original contribution that would hold up at PhD level rather than master's.

What It Shows

Five BM-language titles with correct academic terminology, each paired with a one-line statement of what the study would contribute and why it justifies doctoral scope.

Why It Works

Each title could sustain three years of work. Two attractive options were dropped for being master's-sized questions.

Student Reviews

What Candidates Say About Getting Their Topic Approved

โ˜…โ˜…โ˜…โ˜…โ˜…

"Two titles rejected and my supervisor just kept saying 'too broad' without explaining what narrow looked like. Seeing four screened options side by side made it obvious in ten minutes."

JR
Jian R. MSc Data Science ยท Kuala Lumpur
โœ“ Approved on Third Attempt
โ˜…โ˜…โ˜…โ˜…โ˜…

"They cut the option I liked most because I couldn't get access to the respondents in time. Annoying to hear, but they were right โ€” I'd have wasted a semester finding that out myself."

MK
Mei K. MBA ยท Selangor
โœ“ Saved a Semester
โ˜…โ˜…โ˜…โ˜…โ˜…

"Every topic came with the actual papers behind the gap. When my supervisor asked how I found it, I could open the PDF and show her the limitation on the page."

AH
Amirul H. MSc Management ยท Penang
โœ“ Gap Defended in Meeting
โ˜…โ˜…โ˜…โ˜…โ˜…

"I only wanted my existing title checked, not a whole shortlist. They charged me for the check and told me it just needed one variable removed."

SD
Shanti D. BSc Psychology ยท FYP
โœ“ Charged for the Small Job
โ˜…โ˜…โ˜…โ˜…โ˜…

"Saya perlukan lima tajuk PhD dalam Bahasa Malaysia dan setiap satu ada kenyataan sumbangan. Dua tajuk digugurkan sebab terlalu kecil untuk peringkat kedoktoran."

NR
Noraini R. PhD Pendidikan ยท Kedah
โœ“ Tajuk PhD Diluluskan
โ˜…โ˜…โ˜…โ˜…โ˜…

"My supervisor insisted on primary data and my first idea depended entirely on a public dataset. That constraint alone changed which topics were even possible."

FT
Farid T. MSc Analytics ยท Johor
โœ“ Primary Data Topic Found
โ˜…โ˜…โ˜…โ˜…โ˜…

"They found a study almost identical to my planned title, published last year. Better to learn that before registration than in my literature review."

CY
Chin Y. DBA ยท Kuala Lumpur
โœ“ Duplicate Caught Early
โ˜…โ˜…โ˜…โ˜…โ˜…

"Diploma FYP and I had no sense of what scale was realistic. The most interesting option got cut because I couldn't book the equipment โ€” which was the honest answer."

IZ
Izzat Z. Diploma Biotechnology
โœ“ Scope Matched to Level
Transparent Pricing

How Much Does Research Topic Selection Help Cost?

The cheapest stage of your candidature to get right, and the most expensive to get wrong.

Topic ServiceLevelStarting FromTypical Delivery
Single Topic Feasibility Check Any Level RM 120 1โ€“2 Days
Topic Shortlist โ€” 3 Options With Gap Evidence Bachelor / FYP RM 180 3โ€“4 Days
Topic Shortlist โ€” 5 Options With Gap Evidence Masters / MBA RM 260 4โ€“6 Days
Topic Shortlist โ€” Doctoral Scope PhD / DBA RM 420 6โ€“9 Days
Title Refinement + Aim, Objectives & RQ Skeleton Any Level RM 190 2โ€“3 Days
Topic Rescue After Rejection Any Level RM 220 3โ€“5 Days
Preliminary Reading List โ€” 15 Sources Any Level RM 240 3โ€“4 Days
Supervisor Pitch One-Pager Any Level RM 150 2โ€“3 Days
Topic + Full Proposal Bundle Masters / PhD RM 520 8โ€“14 Days

Price depends on your level, how much screening the field needs, and whether you want the reading list and pitch document alongside the shortlist. If your topic is already close and only needs narrowing, say so โ€” the feasibility check is often all that is required, and it costs a fraction of a shortlist.

Gap evidence with named studies Five feasibility checks per topic Trade-offs written out Your supervisor's rules applied One revision round free Editable Word file
FAQ

Thesis Topic Selection Help Malaysia โ€” Frequently Asked Questions

A single topic feasibility check starts at RM 120. A shortlist with gap evidence starts at RM 180 for FYP level, RM 260 for master's and RM 420 for doctoral scope. Title refinement with an aim and objectives skeleton is RM 190. You get an exact figure before paying anything, and if a cheaper option solves your problem we will point you to it.

Start from constraints, not interests. How many months do you have, who can you realistically reach for data, what analysis can you handle, and what has your supervisor already ruled out? Then read the last three years in your area โ€” particularly the future research sections โ€” and look for a specific limitation you could address. An interest becomes a topic at the moment you can name who you will ask and what you will measure.

In our experience it is almost always one of six things: the scope covers half a field, there is no gap behind it, it cannot be finished in your remaining time, the data is unreachable, it does not clearly belong to your programme, or the study already exists. Send us the title and their exact wording and we will tell you which one it is โ€” the pattern is usually obvious from the feedback.

Specific enough to name the variables, the population and the setting in one line. "Digital transformation in SMEs" is a field, not a topic. "Cloud accounting adoption among manufacturing SMEs in Selangor" is a topic, because a reader immediately knows who will be surveyed and what will be measured. If your title could describe fifty different studies, it is still too wide.

Look inside existing work rather than for its absence. The eight richest places are future research sections, contradictory findings between credible studies, relationships never tested in a Malaysian context, under-studied populations, methodological monocultures, missing mediators or moderators, problems named in policy and industry documents, and genuinely recent phenomena. A gap you can attribute to a named paper always beats one you inferred.

It varies by programme and by supervisor. Some assign from an existing research cluster; most expect you to arrive with a proposal and will react to it rather than generate one for you. Turning up with two or three screened options is far more productive than turning up empty-handed or with a single idea you are already attached to.

Yes, and it is worth doing before you register the title rather than after. We search for studies with your combination of variables, population and context, and tell you plainly if something very close already exists โ€” along with whether the overlap kills the topic or can be turned into a differentiating angle.

Significantly. It rules out anything that depends on public or third-party datasets and makes respondent access the deciding factor. Every option on your shortlist is then screened for who you would survey or interview, how many you need, and whether you can reach them inside your timeline. Tell us this rule at the start โ€” it changes which topics are even worth considering.

A single feasibility check takes a day or two. A full shortlist with gap evidence takes three to six days at master's level and up to nine for doctoral scope, because the literature scan has to be deeper. If your supervision meeting is sooner than that, tell us the date and we will confirm what can be delivered properly by then.

Yes. Titles are formulated in Bahasa Malaysia with correct academic terminology, which matters more than a direct translation would suggest โ€” a title translated word for word from English usually reads awkwardly on a registration form. We can supply an English rendering alongside where your faculty asks for both.

A title alone is not. What makes a topic usable is the gap evidence behind it and a one-page skeleton of aim, objectives and research questions โ€” that combination is what a supervisor reacts to, and it is what a proposal is then built on. Both are included with every shortlist rather than sold as extras.

One revision round is included, and it is used often. Tell us what did not appeal and why โ€” usually it is the population or the method rather than the subject โ€” and we screen a fresh set against the same constraints. You should be interested enough in your topic to live with it for a year or more.

Yes, and most students do it that way. The specialist who screened your topic already knows your constraints, your supervisor's rules and the literature around your gap, so nothing has to be re-explained. There is a bundled price if you know upfront that you want both.

Completely. The options we build for you are not offered to another student, published as samples, or reused in a later shortlist. Topics are the one thing in this industry that genuinely cannot be shared โ€” in a market this small, a duplicated title can end an originality claim before the research even begins.

Still circling an area with no title?Describe the field in a sentence and tell us how long you have.

๐Ÿ’ฌ WhatsApp Your Idea
๐Ÿšจ Registration Deadline Close

Title Due and Nothing Approved Yet?

Send your field, your programme, how long you have left and any feedback you've already been given. You'll get a screened shortlist and an exact price โ€” and if your deadline is too tight for proper screening, we'll say so.